AI models trained on your data.Deployed Privately.

We find where your model falls short, shape your data, and measure whether tuning helps. You approve the budget and see the results before deploying. If training isn’t the answer, we’ll tell you.

Eval-first path from your data to private deploymentProprietary data is evaluated on a held-out test split before training. You approve a capped plan. Training uses the method scoped for your task. The tuned model is compared with the baseline on the same held-out test set for quality, cost, and speed. Deploy through an authenticated private API on dedicated GPUs only if results justify it. Schematic illustration without performance figures.Proprietary DataDocuments · Records · LabelsModelTestHeld-out testBaselineBefore training spendBudget capApprove → trainTrainCapped plan · SFT/DPO/RLBaseTunedSame held-out testEvaluateQuality · Cost · SpeedDedicated GPUReportPrivate APIDeploy if resultsjustify itTune method when warranted · SFT · DPO · RL · scoped in your plan
Swipe to see all five steps →

Industry perspective · Model ownership

“Companies need to turn their workflows, domain knowledge, and accumulated judgment into AI systems that improve with each use.”

Satya Nadella

Microsoft

In his article A frontier without an ecosystem is not stable, Nadella argues that companies should retain control of their knowledge and use their own evaluations to measure whether AI improves business results.

Read the article on X

Revolut Cut AI Coding Costs by 90% Using a Self-Hosted Open-Source Model!

David Abitbol

Revolut

Speaking at AI Engineer NYC, Abitbol said: Open source is now a priority at Revolut, and our economics are favorable. The Register reports Revolut cut its AI coding inference costs by roughly 90 percent by self-hosting an open model.

Read the report on The Register

[Deliverables]

What you receive.

Every engagement starts with a task and data review, a baseline evaluation, and a scoped recommendation. If we proceed with tuning, these are the deliverables we agree with you.

01

A model trained for your task

When tuning is justified, we train an open-weight model on your approved proprietary data. You receive the model weights or adapters agreed in the project scope.

02

Measured results against your baseline

Your evaluation report compares quality, cost, and speed on the same held-out test set. It shows improvements, regressions, tradeoffs, and whether deployment is justified. Lower inference cost is a measured goal; improvements are not guaranteed.

03

A private API on dedicated GPUs

If results justify deployment and you approve it, we deliver an authenticated inference API on dedicated GPU capacity, with integration documentation. We agree capacity, access controls, data handling, and operating responsibilities before deployment.

You own your data and tuned model, subject to the base model’s license. We agree who operates and maintains the endpoints.

[Models delivered]

Three models. Three business tasks.

Educational content

Irish education

Extract book metadata from educational content into structured fields.

MeasureField-level accuracy and valid JSON on held-out documents.

MethodTask-specific eval harness before any tuning recommendation.

Study-level extraction

Cancer research

Extract study-level information from cancer research documents for researchers to review.

MeasureStudy-level F1 and reviewer-aligned gold set on excluded test studies.

MethodGroup-safe splits so near-duplicate studies never cross train and test.

Resume authenticity

Hiring

Flag resume claims for authenticity review. People investigate the flags and make hiring decisions.

MeasurePrecision on flagged claims vs human review; cost per reviewed resume.

MethodBaseline on generic models, then SFT only when flags improve without excess noise.

Discuss your project

[Models & methods]

The right model starts with the task.

We select an open-weight base and tuning method around your data, success criteria, and budget. Model eligibility and licensing are confirmed before training.

[What we measure]

Does the tuned model improve your task?

We compare the tuned model with your current model on the same test examples. You see what improved and what got worse before deciding to deploy.

Accuracy
Compare correct answers, missing fields, and errors against your current model.
Cost
Measure inference costs, retries, and human review costs per correctly completed task.
Speed
Measure response time and the time people spend checking and correcting outputs.

Before training, we agree which metric must improve and which limits must hold. A cheaper model is not useful if it makes too many errors.

[How it works]

Start with the problem. Measure before you train.

You bring domain expertise. We handle the ML engineering.

Your team defines success and reviews results. We prepare the data, tune the model, and measure what changed.

Explore the five stages of working with Attempts
Step 01 / 05Data → decision

Review the task and data

You show us the task, available data, and current errors. We assess data quality, agree success criteria, and identify deployment requirements.

What you receive

An agreed task, success criteria, and data-readiness assessment.

Step 02 / 05Data → decision

Measure the baseline

We separate training, validation, and test data and measure your current model. You receive a recommendation on whether tuning is justified.

What you receive

Baseline scores and a recommendation on whether to tune.

Step 03 / 05Data → decision

Approve and train

You approve the scope and capped budget before training starts. We tune the model on approved data and select candidates using validation data.

What you receive

A model candidate trained within the approved scope and budget.

Step 04 / 05Data → decision

Evaluate the results

We compare the tuned model with the baseline on the same held-out test examples, excluded from training and model selection. The report shows quality, cost, speed, and tradeoffs against agreed success criteria.

What you receive

A comparison report showing improvements, regressions, and tradeoffs.

Step 05 / 05Data → decision

Decide on deployment

If the results justify deployment, you approve the next step. We deliver an authenticated inference API on dedicated GPUs, the agreed model artifacts, and integration instructions.

What you receive

An approved deployment and integration handoff, or a recommendation to keep your current model.

[FAQ]

Questions before you start.

How much data do we need?

It depends on the task and the quality of your examples. We check whether the examples cover your task, have consistent answers, and leave enough separate examples for testing.

What will it cost, and how long will it take?

We propose a budget and timeline after reviewing your task and data. Training starts only after you approve the plan.

How do you decide whether the tuned model is better?

We agree success criteria before training, then compare your current model and the tuned model on the same held-out test set, excluded from training and model selection. We measure quality, cost, and speed and show the tradeoffs. You review the report and approve any production deployment.

What if tuning does not help?

You receive the results and our recommendation: improve the data, try another approach, or keep your current model. We do not guarantee an improvement.

Where will our data and model run?

The deployment offer uses dedicated GPU capacity with an authenticated inference API. Dedicated GPUs do not by themselves place the model inside your own VPC or private network. We agree hosting location, access controls, and data handling before you share a dataset.

Who owns the data and model?

You own your data and your tuned model. The base model retains its original license, which governs permitted use and redistribution. Ownership and handoff terms are recorded in the project agreement.

Do we need an in-house ML team?

No. We handle data preparation, tuning, and evaluation. Your team provides a task owner who can judge examples, define success, and review results, plus an engineering contact to connect the API and coordinate deployment.

[Start a project]

Tell us the task.

Describe what the model should do, what it gets wrong today, and what data you have. An engineer will reply within one business day.

We start by reviewing your task and available data, then scope a baseline evaluation and recommend whether tuning is worth pursuing.

Describe your data here; do not include sensitive records. We agree scope and budget before training starts.

See how we handle enquiries and workspace data in Data & privacy.